Surferrosa escribió: 05 Dic 2020, 16:14 No podemos entenderlo porque es un sentimiento...es algo que no se puede razonar.

Surferrosa escribió: 05 Dic 2020, 16:14 No podemos entenderlo porque es un sentimiento...es algo que no se puede razonar.

denita escribió: 05 Dic 2020, 16:32 Esta gente que dice ser del género fluído, ¿qué se creen que sentimos los demás? Hablo de la mayoría de personas, que tampoco nos sentimos "identificadas" con ningún rol. Yo un día me pongo pantalones y veo la Fórmula 1, y al día siguiente me maquillo y hago pasteles. ¿Quiere decir eso que un día soy chico y al siguiente chica? Es que es ridículo, de verdad. Y lo peor es que esto se vea como progresismo y avance, cuando es lo contrario.

Parru escribió: 05 Dic 2020, 19:31 Eheheh, porfis, que yo este mes y medio último del año es el que más curro y ando en mi mundo de series, dibujos y documentales varios con una equis en medio y loca perdida y no me entero de nada. Qué pasó con Teresa Rodríguez? Me quedé con lo de la chica está de su partido en el parlamento andaluz con la camiseta polémica, que manca carallo con la jamba, pa que luego nos llamen radicales a nosotras (otra de las cosas que rabia soberana me da). Me ilustra alguna, por favor?

serena escribió: 05 Dic 2020, 16:07 Lo de género fluido no lo entiendo. ¿Según qué van variando? ¿En qué situaciones les es preferible ser mujer y en cuáles hombre? ¿Porqué la ropa es lo que define si son hombre o mujer?
Sinceramente no entiendo

Drama escribió: 06 Dic 2020, 12:22

serena escribió: 05 Dic 2020, 16:07 Lo de género fluido no lo entiendo. ¿Según qué van variando? ¿En qué situaciones les es preferible ser mujer y en cuáles hombre? ¿Porqué la ropa es lo que define si son hombre o mujer?
Sinceramente no entiendo

SI fuese así, el 95% del tiempo sería un camionero rumano.

And then there are the things he has admitted to: He has admitted to sending a very ugly message to a woman who criticized the way he ran his page. He has admitted that he used that page to meet women. He has freely—and one might even say proudly—admitted that his interest in feminism is at least partly based in “self-interest.” And I don’t mean in the way that feminism is good for everyone. No, this guy wants to be a professional feminist.

Some of us are angry that this person who ought to know better so often uses the word “vagina” (even as he verbally abused a woman who dared question him) in ways that ignore and even erase trans* people from the equation; that someone who claims to be an expert on feminism can be so clueless about intersectionality.

MRAs have joined in to support this dude and to gleefully accuse us of eating our own.

Men who use the feminist movement to further their own ambitions do so at our expense, which means that instead of helping us to tear down these oppressive systems, they are using feminism to benefit from them, which is pretty fucking sick if you think about it.

Writer. Lesbian. Army Vet. Texan. Hoya. She/Her. @TrumanProject '19. Rep:@lynnjohnstonlit Alum: @HRC Inquiries: cmclymer@gmail.com Bandera arcoíris #BLM Text: 2029183830

Magdalen Berns responds to the Channel 4 soliloquy by Charlotte Clymer (formally known as Charles Clymer the exiled “male feminist”) about his transition, gender and sex.

...Despite all these amazing plans for women, one glaring problem remains in Warren’s feminist credentials: she doesn’t seem to know what a woman even is.

Warren’s policy on LGBT+ rights makes clear that she intends to put males who identify as women above actual women, themselves. Although the policy claims to be for LGBT people, it mentions the word “trans” 48 times, and “non-binary” four times. The word “lesbian” is only mentioned once.

The plan only uses the word “women” to discuss males who are trans-identified. This is despite the fact that lesbian and bisexual women face challenges that are unique and specific to their population, and trans-identified individuals make up the smallest portion of the LGBT community.

“I will create a new grant program within the Office of Violence Against Women that will specifically channel resources into organizations by and for transgender people.”

Warren’s plan promises to take money away from the office of Violence Against Women and channel that money towards biological males. She justified this by claiming that 19 trans women were killed in 2019. Meanwhile, nearly two thousand women are killed by men in the United States annually. Taking resources away from solving violence against women to male-on-male violence is a gross disservice to women.

While Warren has promised to “go to the Rose Garden every year to read the names of transgender people of color who have been killed”, she has shown no such interest in tackling violence against women. Perhaps because the list would simply be too long to read.

“We have to stop putting trans women who are incarcerated into prisons with men where they are at risk.”

In addition to taking money away from domestic violence victims, Warren would also further traumatize vulnerable women by forcing them to be incarcerated with males. Her plan states, “I will direct the Bureau of Prisons to end the Trump Administration’s dangerous policy of imprisoning transgender people in facilities based on their sex assigned at birth.”

As we previously reported, housing male criminals with women, who are often victims of male violence themselves, is both dangerous and unjust.

This isn’t just hypothetical. Richard Masbrach, who was convicted of raping and torturing women, is currently being incarcerated in a California women’s facility. While there, female inmates reported that he raped and assaulted them with foreign objects.

Warren has shown sympathy to male predators, like when she tweeted support for Charlotte (formerly Charles) Clymer in July. Clymer is a sexist who is known for cruelly lashing out at women who disagree with him.

“Our laws don’t consistently protect against discrimination based on…. gender identity. It’s past time to change that.”

Elizabeth Warren, along with every 2020 Democratic candidate, has supported the Equality Act. While in many ways the Equality Act is a great step forward for women and LGBT communities, the Act would also enshrine into law the collection of sexist stereotypes that is “gender identity”.

The bill would pave the way for women’s spaces, sports, and protections to be unraveled so that male-bodied people may enter them...